CVE-2022-45699 Scanner

APsystems ECU-R Firmware is utilized in the renewable energy space, specifically for managing and monitoring solar power systems. It is developed by APsystems, a market leader in solar microinverter technology. The firmware operates as part of the ECU-R unit, which is installed in residential and commercial setups for tracking solar energy production and consumption. It supports the administration and configuration of various parameters within solar energy systems. By leveraging the ECU-R Firmware, users can optimize their energy use, troubleshoot issues, and enhance the efficiency of their solar systems. The firmware is essential for homeowners and businesses aiming to maximize their investments in solar energy technology.

The Command Injection vulnerability in the APsystems ECU-R Firmware allows unauthorized remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands. This specific vulnerability exists in the administration interface of the firmware. It is caused by inadequate input validation on the timezone parameter, which can be exploited by injecting malicious command sequences. Exploiting this vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access and full control over the affected system. Due to this weakness, sensitive operations can be manipulated remotely without authentication.

The technical basis of this vulnerability stems from the incorrect handling of user input within the timezone parameter in the APsystems ECU-R Firmware. Specifically, when processing requests to the endpoint at /index.php/management/set_timezone, the firmware fails to adequately sanitize input, allowing attackers to inject shell commands. This input is handled with insufficient validation, creating an opportunity for injection of commands followed by semicolons. Attackers exploit this by sending crafted requests that can execute commands on the system as the root user.

If exploited, this Command Injection vulnerability could allow attackers to gain root-level access to the system, executing arbitrary commands. This could lead to critical consequences such as disruption of energy production monitoring, unauthorized changes to the system setup, and potential damage to the infrastructure. Additionally, it could facilitate further exploitation of network segments connected to the compromised device. Sensitive user data managed by the system could also be exposed or manipulated, leading to privacy concerns.