CVE-2017-3132 Scanner
CVE-2017-3132 Scanner - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS
Short Info
Level
Medium
Single Scan
Single Scan
Can be used by
Asset Owner
Estimated Time
10 seconds
Time Interval
2 weeks 18 hours
Scan only one
URL
Toolbox
-
Fortinet FortiOS is a network security operating system that powers Fortinet's suite of security appliances. These appliances are used widely by enterprises of all sizes to ensure robust perimeter defense and secure network traffic. System administrators and IT professionals rely on FortiOS for its seamless integration with security features like VPN, firewall, and intrusion prevention. The software's flexibility makes it suitable for various deployment scenarios, from small office setups to large-scale enterprise environments. By providing centralized security controls and visibility, FortiOS enhances threat management. This product is crucial for organizations focused on maintaining secure network operations against emerging threats.
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) is a vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into webpages viewed by other users. In this specific instance involving Fortinet FortiOS, the vulnerability is exploitable via the action input during the activation of a FortiToken. Such vulnerabilities arise when web applications defer the validation of user input, potentially accommodating harmful scripts. Upon exploitation, attackers could execute malicious JavaScript, potentially leading to data theft or session hijacking. This vulnerability is particularly concerning in environments where user interaction with affected web pages is frequent. Addressing XSS vulnerabilities is crucial given their potential impact on web security.
The technical details reveal that the vulnerability resides in the FortiToken activation endpoint of Fortinet FortiOS. Attackers can exploit this endpoint by injecting scripts through the action parameter. This request could result in the execution of scripts under the security context of the logged-in user. If an attacker succeeds, they could alter page content or redirect users to malicious sites. Successful injection depends on the web application's failure to sanitize input adequately. The concern here is that once such a script is executed, access credentials or other sensitive data could be stolen without the user’s knowledge. Solutions involve meticulous input validation and filtering to avert script execution.
If this vulnerability is successfully exploited, attackers can conduct actions such as session hijacking or phishing attacks. The execution of unauthorized scripts may allow for manipulation of a website's document object model. Furthermore, there is a heightened risk of data theft, where attackers could extract sensitive personal information, or spread malware by executing malicious code. In a worst-case scenario, an organization’s digital assets and bottom line could be jeopardized if attackers gain extended access. These potential negative consequences underline the need for immediate remediation and continuous security monitoring.
REFERENCES