Jupyter Notebook Remote Code Execution Scanner
Detects 'Remote Code Execution' vulnerability in Jupyter Notebook.
Short Info
Level
High
Single Scan
Single Scan
Can be used by
Asset Owner
Estimated Time
10 seconds
Time Interval
18 days 2 hours
Scan only one
Domain, IPv4, Subdomain
Toolbox
-
Jupyter Notebook is a widely used open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents that contain live code, equations, visualizations, and narrative text. It is used in data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. Designed for data scientists, researchers, and educators, Jupyter Notebooks provide an interactive interface to connect with data in various programming languages. It supports a range of programming languages, including Python, R, Julia, and Scala. The software is commonly employed in academic research and industrial analytics environments. Adaptive and versatile, it facilitates integration with various tools and data sets to enhance productivity and learning.
Remote Code Execution (RCE) is a serious vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands or code on a target machine, potentially gaining control over it. This type of exploit occurs when an attacker can run code from a remote location, potentially leading to severe data breaches or loss. An RCE vulnerability can be exploited without physical presence or direct access to the target system. In the context of Jupyter Notebook, this could allow attackers to manipulate data or inject malicious scripts. Successful exploitation may lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data and resources. Addressing such vulnerabilities is crucial to maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of systems.
The Remote Code Execution vulnerability in Jupyter Notebook typically stems from weaknesses in the API/terminals path, as indicated in the template. The exploit involves sending specially crafted HTTP requests to the '/api/terminals' endpoint, potentially bypassing authorization mechanisms. The vulnerability is confirmed by detecting specific JSON responses, such as "name" and "last_activity." This technical flaw can allow attackers to interact with the system's command line, executing arbitrary shell commands. Attackers may exploit this by injecting payloads that manipulate system processes or extract critical information. Patch management and application security best practices are paramount to mitigate these risks.
If the Remote Code Execution vulnerability is exploited in Jupyter Notebook, the fallout can be extensive and impactful. Malicious actors may take complete control over the affected notebook server, leading to data theft, unauthorized data manipulation, or server compromise. Such exploitation could pave the way for lateral movement within a network, leading to further breaches and compromise of connected systems. The integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the data on the server could be severely affected. Such vulnerabilities can erode user trust and lead to significant reputational and financial damage for organizations relying on Jupyter Notebook for critical functions.
REFERENCES