Name: Pug.js Scanner
Same as Meta Description
Short Info
Level
Single Scan
Single Scan
Can be used by
Asset Owner
Estimated Time
10 seconds
Time Interval
16 days 13 hours
Scan only one
URL
Toolbox
Pug.js is a robust template engine primarily used in Node.js environments to simplify the generation of HTML documents. Developers leverage Pug.js for its ability to streamline front-end interfaces, making it popular across various industries including e-commerce, blogging, and enterprise applications. Due to its widespread adoption, ensuring its security is critical to preventing unauthorized access or attacks on sensitive data. The language's syntax is crisp, and its features allow for cleaner code, efficiently transforming data into web content. As a server-side feature, Pug.js can impact both the user interface and overall user experience when properly utilized. Its integration into numerous digital ecosystems necessitates regular security reviews, especially concerning injection vulnerabilities.
Server Side Template Injection (SSTI) is a notable vulnerability detected in template engines like Pug.js, often exploited by malicious actors to execute arbitrary code on a host server. This vulnerability arises when user input is unintentionally processed within templates, bypassing standard input validation protocols. By exploiting SSTI, an attacker can perform unauthorized operations within the system, escalating privileges or compromising user data. The potential for SSTI to affect server integrity makes it a significant security threat, mandating rigorous testing and validation processes. Addressing SSTI vulnerabilities is crucial for maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of system resources. SSTI exemplifies how unchecked user input can lead to severe security breaches in web applications.
The vulnerability often exploits dynamic template engines that allow for unfiltered data input. In Pug.js, this can occur within specific endpoints or parameters that handle user-submitted data. Attackers can inject payloads into these input fields, which are then incorrectly executed by the server. These injection points are critical vulnerabilities within the system's surface area, emphasizing the need for comprehensive security measures. This unauthorized execution of injected code highlights improper input sanitation and the lack of robust security policies. In technical terms, SSTI involves the execution of dynamic expressions which lack the necessary security filtering. To address these issues, strict access controls and secure coding practices are vital.
If exploited, SSTI can allow attackers to gain full control over the affected server, leading to potential data theft, service disruption, or further dissemination of malware. The ability to execute arbitrary code opens doors for attackers to manipulate server configurations, corrupt databases, or introduce harmful software. Beyond the immediate loss of data, the reputational damage and financial implications for businesses can be substantial. Affected systems could face prolonged downtimes while rectifying exploited vulnerabilities, impacting business operations. Moreover, the insights gained by attackers through SSTI can lead to more targeted, sophisticated attacks in the future. Thus, it remains essential to patch discovered vulnerabilities quickly to mitigate irreparable harm.
REFERENCES